mirror of
https://codeberg.org/reverse-skill-lab/apk-reverse
synced 2026-11-15 21:04:20 +08:00
A JVM reader that dies on a large or deeply nested input -- OutOfMemoryError, an OOM kill, a container limit, a timeout -- prints an empty result that looks exactly like a reader that read the file and found nothing. That is the `present but unreadable` case SKILL.md §Coverage names, and it is where a wrong "that class is not in there" gets recorded. The new section in toolchain.md says what a failed analysis actually supports (a claim about the route, not about the artifact) and the three things to check before a negative from a heavy tool becomes a finding: the exit code and stderr rather than stdout alone, a re-run with room to work, and the indexed-query route that answers most location questions without materialising anything. A deadline you set yourself gets the same reading -- it reported nothing about the target. Also: the README claimed the scripts "work identically on Windows, macOS and Linux", while every gate run, every test result and every figure in the evidence record comes from one Windows host. The claim now carries the strength it actually has -- measured on Windows, `unverified` elsewhere -- and names the usual suspects (path separators, `os.pathsep` in `APKREV_TOOLS`, console encodings, ADB shell quoting) so a first run on another platform has somewhere to look.